Agri Explainers

Trade policies and agreements across North America—especially among the U.S., Canada, and Mexico—play a central role in shaping agricultural exports, imports, regulatory standards, and the competitiveness of farmers and agribusinesses. The **U.S.–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA)** (also called **CUSMA** in Canada) is the current primary trade framework replacing NAFTA. Below is a breakdown of how it works, its key agriculture provisions, and related trade dynamics.

---

What is USMCA / CUSMA?

- The USMCA entered into force on July 1, 2020, replacing the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0} - In the U.S., it is known as USMCA; in Canada, in English it’s CUSMA (Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement). :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1} - The agreement is intended not just to maintain tariff-free trade where possible, but also to modernize rules around digital trade, intellectual property, labor, and sector-specific provisions including agriculture. :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

Key Agriculture & Food Provisions in USMCA

• Tariff and Market Access Adjustments: USMCA preserves zero tariffs for many agricultural goods that were already duty-free under NAFTA. :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3} It also opens new access, especially in sensitive sectors like dairy, poultry, eggs, and certain processed foods, by adjusting quotas, eliminating certain restrictions, or improving TRQ management. :contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}
• Sanitary & Phytosanitary (SPS) Discipline: The agreement strengthens transparency and collaboration in SPS measures—import checks, equivalency, audits, and risk-based regulation—to reduce trade disruptions stemming from health or safety measures. :contentReference[oaicite:5]{index=5}
• Biotechnology & Gene-Editing Rules: USMCA is the first agreement among these three nations to explicitly cover “modern biotechnology” (including gene editing) under its rules. :contentReference[oaicite:6]{index=6} It aims to harmonize how biotech products are treated, encourage innovation, and limit trade-distorting restrictions. :contentReference[oaicite:7]{index=7}
• Geographical Indications (GIs): The agreement establishes procedural safeguards around GIs so that common product names (e.g. “cheddar,” “parmesan”) cannot be unfairly restricted or monopolized. :contentReference[oaicite:8]{index=8}
• Rules of Origin & Origin Claims: For preferential (duty-free) treatment, agricultural goods must meet specific rules of origin. Goods that do not comply lose eligibility and face regular tariffs. :contentReference[oaicite:9]{index=9}
• Dispute Settlement & Cooperation: The agreement includes mechanisms for consultations, trade remedy challenges, and dispute panels—especially relevant when trade or regulatory practices trigger cross-border disagreements. :contentReference[oaicite:10]{index=10}

Challenges and Points of Friction

While USMCA strengthens many trade rules, actual performance hinges on implementation, regulatory alignment, and political will. Some key challenges:

• Quota Fill & TRQ Management: Even when access is granted, filling quota-based markets can be limited by administrative or non-transparent practices.
• Divergent Standards and Approvals: SPS, biotech, or labeling rules may differ, creating friction at borders or delays in approvals.
• Non-Agreement Measures: Domestic subsidies, countervailing duties, or export restrictions sometimes undermine trade promise—U.S., Canada, Mexico must maintain transparency and minimal distortion. :contentReference[oaicite:11]{index=11}
• Political Shifts & Tariff Risks: Tariff threats or trade policy changes can unsettle confidence. (See recent U.S. tariff measures affecting cross-border trade) :contentReference[oaicite:12]{index=12}

Other Regional or Bilateral Trade Dynamics

Beyond USMCA, agricultural trade in North America is also shaped by:

• Bilateral trade claims, subsidies, or regulatory adjustments between the U.S. and individual partners (e.g. the U.S.–Mexico agricultural relationship, trade disputes, anti-dumping or safeguard measures).
• Multilateral frameworks (e.g. WTO rules) that overlay domestic and regional agreements.
• Non-tariff barriers like labelling regimes, certification requirements, or environmental and labor provisions that indirectly influence agriculture trade flows.

Why This Matters for Farmers & Agri-Businesses

• Favorable trade terms help stabilize export demand, pricing, and investment incentives across borders.
• Clear biotech and SPS rules reduce uncertainty for seed developers, input firms, and crop exporters.
• Transparent quota and origin rules mean fewer surprises at the border or during customs clearance.
• Dispute mechanisms provide recourse in case of unfair trade actions by member countries.

For deeper trade-news insight, see our coverage of **Mexico’s GM corn ban dispute via USMCA panels** and other trade rulings in our news section.

Disclaimer:
This explainer synthesizes publicly available sources including USTR, USDA/FAS, National Ag Law Center, and trade fact sheets. It is for informational purposes and not legal or trade-compliance advice.